mizvekov added a comment. In D109654#3002862 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D109654#3002862>, @thakis wrote:
> Yes, https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1250052 I haven't > yet verified it's definitely due to this change, but it's the most > related-looking change in the regression range. Okay, I assumed any regressions here would be covered by at least `clang\test\SemaObjCXX\block-capture.mm`, but it's possible the test invocation is wrong. We definitely need to improve the test coverage for ObjC++ if we missed this otherwise :-( Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D109654/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D109654 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
