catenacyber added a comment. > .profraw are files with the raw profile format. The compiler-rt/lib/profile > runtime and llvm-profdata only support one version at any commit.
Ok. > Mixing .profraw files produced by different compiler-rt/lib/profile runtimes > is unsupported. I do not think I am mixing profraw files as I have only one profraw file. If my llvm-profdata is not supporting the profraw file produced by rust + linker, should it not error with ` Unsupported instrumentation profile format version` instead of `malformed instrumentation profile data` As it does with rust nightly and clang 12 ? > I don't know what rustc and https://github.com/ctz/rustls do. Rustls is just an example rust project, I think we get the same result with every rust project. > I don't think this change is responsible as the change has been well > released/tested by many C++ groups. I guess I did not mean to use the word responsible. I am just saying that if I `git revert a1532ed27582038e2d9588108ba0fe8237f01844` and solve the conflicts on top of main, I get my scenario to work again > If Rust adapts compiler-rt and does something different, I think the > investigation responsibility is on Rust's side. > > Perhaps you can get some help from rustc folks who do the compiler-rt > adaptation in rustc. I am asking indeed Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D104556/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D104556 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
