aaron.ballman added a comment.
Is this syntax used by any other tools?
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/infrastructure/nolintbeginend.cpp:6
+
+// NOLINTEND
+class B1 { B1(int i); };
----------------
Do you think this should be diagnosed as a sign of user confusion with the
markings?
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/infrastructure/nolintbeginend.cpp:86
+
+// NOLINTBEGIN
+class H1 { H1(int i); };
----------------
Should this be diagnosed as user confusion?
My concern in both of these cases isn't so much that someone writes this
intentionally, but that one of the begin/end pair gets removed accidentally
when refactoring. Helping the user to identify *where* the unmatched delimiters
are seems like it could be user-friendly behavior.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D108560/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D108560
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
