hubert.reinterpretcast added a comment. In D106577#2983709 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106577#2983709>, @ThePhD wrote:
> What it does mean is that Clang and every other compiler - so long as they > pick a ISO10646-code point capable encoding for their `wchar_t` literals - > can define this preprocessor macro unconditionally. My understanding is that > on most systems where things have not been patched / tweaked, this applies > since Clang vastly prefers UTF-32 in most of its setups. > > It is my strong recommendation this patch be accepted and made unconditional, > both in anticipation of the upcoming standard and the widespread existing > practice. The paper does //not// update 6.10.8.2 to add "when expressed as a wchar_t character constant" to the wording for the macro which is the subject of this patch. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D106577/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D106577 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
