Eugene.Zelenko added inline comments.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/ContainerDataPointerCheck.cpp:18
+namespace tidy {
+namespace readability {
+ContainerDataPointerCheck::ContainerDataPointerCheck(StringRef Name,
----------------
compnerd wrote:
> Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> > Please separate with empty line.
> Hmm, this is what clang-format does, which should be unambiguously correct.
> Is there something that needs to be changed in clang-format or .clang-format?
Hard to tell about current state of clang-format, but you could take a look on
existing checks code.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D108893/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D108893
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
