Anastasia added a comment. In D107769#2960441 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D107769#2960441>, @svenvh wrote:
> I have done an alternative spin of this patch: instead of introducing > `RequireDisabledExtension`, simply always make the `private`, `global`, and > `local` overloads available. This makes tablegen diverge from `opencl-c.h` > though. Perhaps we should also always add make the `private`, `global`, and > `local` overloads available in `opencl-c.h`? Yes, we could do this indeed as a clang extension. I don't think this will impact the user code. However, this means vendors will have to add extra overloads in OpenCL 2.0 mode? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D107769/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D107769 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
