svenvh added a comment.

>> Instead of `double2_to_float3`, I decided to add `char8_to_short3`.  Same 
>> idea (vectorN to vector3), but reinterpreting 8 chars as 3 shorts feels like 
>> a more realistic case than reinterpreting 2 doubles as 3 floats.  But I'm 
>> happy to add `double2_to_float3` if you think there is a good reason to do 
>> so.
>
> I am sorry for asking more tests because I did not add enough tests 
> previously.
> I do not know well how many type conversions with vec3 the recent OpenCL spec 
> cover but it could be good to add more the tests of the type conversions 
> which the spec mentions. If you feel the tests you have added are enough for 
> it, I am ok with it.

You were absolutely right about asking for more tests!  I believe we now have 
much better coverage, let's see if @Anastasia (or any other reviewer) is also 
fine with the current set.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D108470/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D108470

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to