amyk added inline comments.
================ Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/retaddr_multi_levels.ll:2 +; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py +; RUN: llc -verify-machineinstrs < %s -mtriple=powerpc64le-unknown-linux -mcpu=pwr8 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-64B-LE +; RUN: llc -verify-machineinstrs < %s -mtriple=powerpc64-unknown-linux -mcpu=pwr7 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-64B-BE ---------------- nit: The RUN lines look a bit too long in this test. ================ Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/retaddr_multi_levels.ll:21 +; +; CHECK-64B-BE-LABEL: test0: +; CHECK-64B-BE: # %bb.0: # %entry ---------------- At a glance, it looks like `CHECK-64B-BE` and `CHECK-64B-AIX` looks like they're the same CHECKs. Do you think it's a good idea to combine them into a single check/use check-prefixes? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D107646/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D107646 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits