dexonsmith added a comment. In D106862#2913815 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106862#2913815>, @arphaman wrote:
> I think this approach makes sense for now. It's unfortunate that the > constructor of FullSourceLoc is unable to validate this requirement, do you > know how many clients that you describe as modifying their ID to make them > valid are there? (Maybe an `Optional<FullSourceLoc>` would work for those clients?) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D106862/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D106862 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
