jdoerfert added a comment. > That's fine for me, but don't the routines use llvm_omp_?
That was before we "standardized" `ompx_` for OpenMP 5.2. > Should we also have that prefix in various enumerators in the implementation? > For example, what does OMP_MAP_HOLD become? I'd suggest `OMPX_MAP_HOLD` Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D106509/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D106509 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
