ZarkoCA marked an inline comment as done. ZarkoCA added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:3255-3256 +def warn_not_xl_compatible + : Warning<"requested alignment of arguments 16 bytes or greater is not" + " compatible with previous versions of the AIX XL compiler">, + InGroup<DiagGroup<"builtin-assume-aligned-alignment">>; ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > ZarkoCA wrote: > > aaron.ballman wrote: > > > Should we be talking about the AIX XL compiler in a Clang diagnostic? > > I see your point. Sorry if this isn't what is supposed to be done or if it > > doesn't a good precedent. > > > > The reasons for adding this warning is that our back end implementation > > isn't totally compatible with XL now and, while buggy, users on AIX may > > expect clang and xlclang to be compatible since AIX is the reference > > compiler. The xlclang name implies it's clang based and it's possible for > > users to expect some sort of binary compatibility. > > > > I see your point. Sorry if this isn't what is supposed to be done or if it > > doesn't a good precedent. > > No worries, it's a good discussion to have! We have some MSVC and GCC > compatibility warnings, so there's precedent for naming other compilers. Now > that you've moved the diagnostic into an AIX compatibility diagnostic group, > I am more comfortable with it. Thanks! Thanks, glad it's better now. ================ Comment at: clang/test/Sema/aix-attr-align.c:3 +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple powerpc-ibm-aix-xcoff -verify -fsyntax-only %s + +struct S { ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > Can you add two more RUN lines where we expect no warnings? One would be from > a non AIX triple and the other would be with `-Wno-aix-compat` specified? > > Btw, in case you don't know about it, you can do `-verify=off` for those RUN > lines and add `// off-no-diagnostics` to the top of the file and that should > cover it. Thanks for the suggestion to add more lines, that coverage was missing before from the patch. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D105660/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D105660 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits