[PATCH] D105756: [clang] C++98 implicit moves are back with a vengeance

[Matheus Izvekov via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

mizvekov added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaObjCXX/block-capture.mm:40
 };
-TEST(CopyNoMove); // cxx11_2b-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
+TEST(CopyNoMove); // cxx98_2b-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
 
----------------
Quuxplusone wrote:
> `cxx98_2b` is just `expected`, isn't it?
Yeah, but in this test we don't have the "expected" expectancy string.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D105756/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D105756

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits