NoQ added a comment. In D105637#2867602 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D105637#2867602>, @NoQ wrote:
> You could define your own diagnostic consumer in the unittest and intercept > all the notes. (you can find an example of this in D94476 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D94476>) (I can't believe I haven't landed these patches yet) In D105637#2867602 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D105637#2867602>, @NoQ wrote: > But at this point i'd rather turn this into a LIT test by turning your > checker mock into a `debug.ExprInspection` item (dunno how reusable it'll be, maybe unittest is indeed the way to go) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D105637/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D105637 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
