hoy added a comment.

In D104831#2839301 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104831#2839301>, @tstellar wrote:

> In D104831#2838835 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104831#2838835>, @hoy wrote:
>
>> In D104831#2837712 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104831#2837712>, @MaskRay 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Adding the platform tripplet x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu the while list of 
>>>> supported x86_64 triplets so that it can be used with the --gcc-toolchain 
>>>> option to bypass this process and force-pick a given gcc install.
>>>
>>> Did you set `--target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu`? With that I don't think you 
>>> need another entry in `X86_64Triples`.
>>>
>>> `X86_64Triples` and its friends are quite clumsy and many entries are not 
>>> actually needed. We should shrink the lists.
>>>
>>> For https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824365 I think the right 
>>> fix is to configure clang with x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu as the default 
>>> triple.
>>
>> Explicitly specifying target or configure the default build target would 
>> work. But I thought  the triple vector being updated is designed for 
>> automatic searching and minimizing configure changes across platforms. Is it 
>> not like that?
>>
>> In D104831#2837795 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104831#2837795>, @tstellar 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm curious, what kind of system are you running on where you need to use 
>>> --gcc-toolchain x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu is required.
>>
>> One of our platforms is CentOS 7.
>
> Do you know why clang is not auto-detecting x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu?  I'm 
> just wondering if there is some larger problem.

I'm not sure why `x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu` was not in the preset triples. 
`x86_64-redhat-linux` is there though. Maybe gnu libraries are not commonly 
used on Redhat?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D104831/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D104831

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to