sepavloff added a comment. In D104854#2838659 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854#2838659>, @jdoerfert wrote:
> In D104854#2838495 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854#2838495>, @sepavloff > wrote: > >> In D104854#2838468 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854#2838468>, @thopre wrote: >> >>> Are you planning to do this for the other FP test builtin (isinf, isfinite, >>> isinf_sign, isnormal)? >> >> Yes, they have similar problems. >> If someone would like to implement them it would be nice. > > From a user perspective, it seems sub-optimal to postpone the others "untile > someone wants to implement them". > Once `isnan` behaves differently than the rest, I can see users being > confused and rightfully so. > I don't have a strong opinion but I'd prefer we switch them over together. Sure. I Just want to say that if someone wants or has plans to implement these functions, I appreciate these efforts. This functionality is in my plans. Considering only one function in this patch must facilitatу the review process. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
