mizvekov added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/class/class.init/class.copy.elision/p3.cpp:58-60
A1 test1(A1 &&a) {
- return a; // cxx11_17-error {{call to deleted constructor of
'test_implicitly_movable_rvalue_ref::A1'}}
+ return a;
}
----------------
mizvekov wrote:
> Quuxplusone wrote:
> > Personally, I don't think the world will accept applying P0527
> > unconditionally in pre-C++20 modes. But I guess we'll find out. :P
> Indeed :)
> By the way, I have not found a counter example of strict C++98 code (not
> using extensions) breaking with implicit moves enabled.
> So it looks like we can have one mode for everything here.
Oh never mind I was wrong :)
Found your example: https://godbolt.org/z/T374o518W
Too bad we had not put it in our test suite.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104500/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104500
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
