RedDocMD added a comment. In D103750#2825823 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103750#2825823>, @xazax.hun wrote:
> I believe there are a couple of comments that are done but not marked > accordingly. > I agree with Artem, if we could craft code that fails due to not calling > ctors, we should probably include them in the tests, even if they don't > reflect the desired behavior they are a great source of documentation what is > missing. Do you want the new failing test to be marked //expected to fail//? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D103750/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D103750 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
