SouraVX added a comment. In D104118#2813358 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104118#2813358>, @stuart wrote:
> Note: there is currently no DWARF language code defined for //C++ for > OpenCL//, so we must use DW_LANG_C_plus_plus* if we wish to be able to > determine whether output has been generated from //C++ for OpenCL// source or > from //OpenCL C// source. I have raised DWARF issue 210514.1 > <http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=210514.1> to add a dedicated //C++ > for OpenCL// code in the next version of DWARF, but for now I believe that it > is best to use DW_LANG_OpenCL for //OpenCL C// only, and not for //C++ for > OpenCL//. > > I could perhaps add a note regarding this to the commit message but am > concerned about overcomplicating the message. NIT: It would be nice to have this as part of the commit summary/message itself. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D104118/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D104118 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
