darwin added a comment. In D104044#2814016 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104044#2814016>, @HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> Going the full way, to fix the number of empty lines after/before/between > elements would be real nice. But even nicer would be if you can state a range. > > But I think all those proposed options should not be added in one go. Yes, adding a new option is a new feature requirement. What I am trying to do here is to keep the clang-format behaving reasonably. > In D104044#2812399 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104044#2812399>, @darwin wrote: > >> About the issue, let me explain it. It isn't bound to the google style or >> LLVM style either, since both of them keep the first brace at the same line >> of the namespace. > > Then I would like to use the LLVM style in the tests, otherwise it suggests > that the issue is a result of using google style. Wouldn't this suggest that this issue is a result of using LLVM style? Repository: rZORG LLVM Github Zorg CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D104044/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D104044 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
