melver added a comment. In D103958#2807811 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103958#2807811>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> This is missing langref changes, and a RFC to llvm-dev. We're not there yet, but will send something. Having real code helped me understand what out the myriad of options that were discussed were actually reasonable to implement. (Perhaps I should have uploaded WIP code elsewhere, sorry about that.) > I'm rather skeptical of this. We're trying to solve a serious problem, and the Linux kernel is an important usecase. We'd be very glad to hear constructive criticism, the LKML thread is still ongoing: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arch/yln8dzbnwvqrq...@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/ Thank you. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D103958/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D103958 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits