melver added a comment.

In D103958#2807811 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103958#2807811>, @lebedev.ri 
wrote:

> This is missing langref changes, and a RFC to llvm-dev.

We're not there yet, but will send something. Having real code helped me 
understand what out the myriad of options that were discussed were actually 
reasonable to implement. (Perhaps I should have uploaded WIP code elsewhere, 
sorry about that.)

> I'm rather skeptical of this.

We're trying to solve a serious problem, and the Linux kernel is an important 
usecase. We'd be very glad to hear constructive criticism, the LKML thread is 
still ongoing: 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arch/yln8dzbnwvqrq...@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/

Thank you.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D103958/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D103958

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to