bjope added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/ppc-xmmintrin.c:10 // RUN: -fno-discard-value-names -mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns -o - | llvm-cxxfilt -n | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-LE +// RUN: %clang -x c++ -fsyntax-only -target powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu -mcpu=pwr8 -ffreestanding -DNO_WARN_X86_INTRINSICS %s \ +// RUN: -fno-discard-value-names -mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns ---------------- qiucf wrote: > bjope wrote: > > Unfortunately I get some failures with this. Maybe because of an unstandard > > build setup. > > > > We've started to use `-DCLANG_DEFAULT_RTLIB=compiler-rt > > -DCLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_STDLIB=libc++` when building clang. And we also use > > `-DLLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR=ON`. Not sure if that is a setup that > > is asking for trouble. Anyway, when running this test case we end up with > > > > ``` > > : 'RUN: at line 10'; /workspace/llvm/build/bin/clang -x c++ -fsyntax-only > > -target powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu -mcpu=pwr8 -ffreestanding > > -DNO_WARN_X86_INTRINSICS /workspace/clang/test/CodeGen/ppc-xmmintrin.c > > -fno-discard-value-names -mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns > > -- > > Exit Code: 1 > > > > Command Output (stderr): > > -- > > In file included from /workspace/clang/test/CodeGen/ppc-xmmintrin.c:13: > > In file included from > > /workspace/llvm/build/lib/clang/13.0.0/include/ppc_wrappers/xmmintrin.h:42: > > In file included from > > /workspace/llvm/build/lib/clang/13.0.0/include/altivec.h:44: > > In file included from > > /workspace/llvm/build/bin/../include/c++/v1/stddef.h:39: > > /workspace/llvm/build/bin/../include/c++/v1/__config:13:10: fatal error: > > '__config_site' file not found > > #include <__config_site> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > 1 error generated. > > ``` > > > > Not sure really how to solve that. > > > > Maybe we should stop building like that? > > > > Or there is a bug somewhere (such as that we only get the __config_site > > headers in target specific dirs for targets that we actually build runtimes > > for, maybe something that was missing in https://reviews.llvm.org/D97572)? > > (Maybe @phosek could comment on that?) > > > > Or this test case is missing some options to make it a bit more independent > > on the runtimes build setup? > > > The tests relies on some system stuff. Is the failure related to this change? > (or exposed by `-x c++` option?) Well, i guess it was exposed by `-x c++` (in combination with D975729). I don't really understand how things are supposed to work given the pre-target specific `__config_site`. Since I only build libcxx for `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`, I only get a `__config_site` file for that specific triple inside `bin/../include/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/c++/v1/__config_site` in the build result. But a test case like this one, using a different triple, ends up including `bin/../include/c++/v1/stddef.h`, that wants wants to include `<__config_site>`, but it won't find any such include for the powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu triple. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D103386/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D103386 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
