ychen added a comment. > The LLVM IR langref says that llvm.global_ctors are called in ascending > priority order, and the order between initializers is not defined. That's not > very helpful and often doesn't reflect reality. I wonder if we could do two > things, perhaps separately: > > 1. emit llvm.global_ctors so that they are called in order of appearance in > the IR array (is this not already true?) > 2. define the order of initialization in LangRef
Is there anything preventing us from using the existing priority field to define the order instead of introducing the order among initializers with the same priority? If we go with 1., there would be no way to say that "the order does not matter" right? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D103495/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D103495 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
