bjope added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Lex/PPDirectives.cpp:594 + if (CondInfo.FoundElse) + Diag(Tok, diag::pp_err_elif_after_else) << PED_Elif; ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > bjope wrote: > > Hi @aaron.ballman > > > > This change is missing from > > https://reviews.llvm.org/rG8edd3464afbff65d7d5945b3a8b20009d6ff5deb , while > > you instead got it when doing the pp_err_else_after_else diagnostic a > > couple of lines above this. > > > > It causes asserts (in DIagnostic::getArgKind) for me in test cases > > verifying the "elif after else" scenario using a test case basically doing > > ``` > > #if 1 > > #else > > #elif > > #endif > > ``` > > So maybe such a test case should be added as well? > > > > But it seems like the patch you committed doesn't match with the reviewed > > patch. So maybe you can look into this and fix it? > > (let me know if you need some additional help) > Great catch and thank you for the test case! It seems that when I applied the > patch, it misapplied, but not in a way that caused a test failure. I have no > idea how that happened, but I assume I screwed up something with git > somewhere along the way and caused the failure. > > I've pushed baa2b8d08502acfa91a8dfd699d25f7b4e25edbb to fix it. Thanks! Big thanks for the quick fix! While I managed to track down this problem I didn't have time to properly fix it right away. Now I'll have one thing less to worry about tomorrow :-) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D101192/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D101192 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
