probinson added a comment. In D103125#2782096 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103125#2782096>, @echristo wrote:
> I'm also not a fan of this change. From a project perspective the binary is > clang and while people may wish to change the name for their own product > teams it seems like that onus should be on them. It occurs to me that there's precedent regarding prefixes, which is that you can rename/soft-link clang to have a triple embedded in the name (e.g., x86_64-pc-linux-clang) and then the driver will factor the prefix into default-target computations. But AFAIK there's no support for directly doing that renaming/linking in the build system. I agree with @echristo this properly belongs to the vendors not the project. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D103125/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D103125 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
