luismarques added a comment. In D102839#2783636 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D102839#2783636>, @ksyx wrote:
> So it seems the better way to do this would definitely by adding a > subextension as the spec had changed. But I'd like also to ask how will GCC > deal with this option, and should we make this option an alias to turn off M > extension and turn on ZMMul extension? Regarding "turn off M extension", see Krste's comment in the PR: > I think -mno-div is OK as a compiler option, but it's meaning is for the > compiler not to generate divide instructions, not to indicate what the ISA > is. So for example, -mno-div should not set ELF flags in binary to indicate > ISA doesn't have divide - it should simply not generate divide instructions. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D102839/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D102839 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
