jroelofs added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19871#429153, @etienneb wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19871#428997, @jroelofs wrote: > > > Drive-by thought: I think it would be useful to be able to match implicit > > casts separately from explicit casts when using this new matcher. > > > Jonathan, I think what you are asking for is already supported. > I added an unittest to confirm it. > > EXPECT_TRUE(matches("char *p = 0;", > implicitCastExpr(hasCastKind(CK_NullToPointer)))); > > > If I misunderstood your comment, could you provide an example. Oh, right. That /is/ exactly what I meant. Excellent. http://reviews.llvm.org/D19871 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
