aaronpuchert added a comment.
Again, I'm not sure if it helps to use `getDecltypeForParenthesizedExpr` where
we don't actually have the `decltype` of a parenthesized expression.
It's probably not entirely coincidental, but things aren't defined this way.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp:5845
+ if (!To->isRValue()) {
+ QualType T = Self.Context.getDecltypeForParenthesizedExpr(To);
InitializedEntity Entity = InitializedEntity::InitializeTemporary(T);
----------------
mizvekov wrote:
> aaronpuchert wrote:
> > The quote doesn't reference parenthesized expressions, isn't this just
> > coincidentally the same thing?
> It's fundamentally the same thing. The `getDecltypeForParenthesizedExpr` name
> is what I tried to keep, I don't have better ideas there.
What this is doing is pointwise equal to `getDecltypeForParenthesizedExpr`, but
there is no parenthesized expression, and no `decltype`. There is a quote from
the standard that defines this separately (by now this seems to be
[[http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.cond#4|expr.cond#4]]), and there are some
differences especially in the prvalue case. So I'm not sure this helps.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D100713/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D100713
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
