steakhal added a comment.

In D99260#2704102 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99260#2704102>, @NoQ wrote:

> In https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45786 the godbolt link shows that 
> there are still problems with `addressof` (yes, their "trunk" clang is fresh 
> enough). They seem to have `__addressof` instead of `addressof` so maybe we 
> should cover that case real quick. Or maybe outright suppress reference 
> invalidation on double-underscore functions because the checker generally 
> relies on the number of standard functions that don't invalidate references 
> while taking a non-const reference being very limited but this limit 
> definitely doesn't take double-underscore functions into account.

What is the status quo of this issue? @vsavchenko


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D99260/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D99260

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D99260: [analyze... Balázs Benics via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to