sbc100 added inline comments.
================ Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/Utils/WebAssemblyUtilities.h:40 + // appropriate. + WASM_ADDRESS_SPACE_OBJECT = 1 +}; ---------------- tlively wrote: > sbc100 wrote: > > What does "object" mean here? Are we just talking about reference types? > > Or also wasm globals that hold integers (like `__stack_pointer`). If its > > just ref types that live in this address space should this be called > > `WASM_ADDRESS_SPACE_ANYREF`? If its the latter should this be called > > `WASM_ADDRESS_SPACE_WASM_GLOBAL`? > I was also wondering about the best name here because OBJECT is somewhat > vague. I think the idea is that this address space can be used for arbitrary > Wasm globals of any type, but it could also be used later for things like > additional tables and memories. It's unclear whether those would need > separate address spaces for some reason, but if they don't, re-using this > address space 1 would be best. > > Maybe `WASM_ADDRESS_SPACE_STATIC` would be a better name because it will be > used for things that are given static indices in the final module? > I was also wondering about the best name here because OBJECT is somewhat > vague. I think the idea is that this address space can be used for arbitrary > Wasm globals of any type, but it could also be used later for things like > additional tables and memories. It's unclear whether those would need > separate address spaces for some reason, but if they don't, re-using this > address space 1 would be best. > > Maybe `WASM_ADDRESS_SPACE_STATIC` would be a better name because it will be > used for things that are given static indices in the final module? But that is also true for static data symbols that point memory addresess. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D101608/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D101608 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
