TWeaver added inline comments.

================
Comment at: 
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-vararg-ms.cpp:7
+
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-vararg %t
+
----------------
njames93 wrote:
> TWeaver wrote:
> > Is the missing FileCheck call here on purpose? it seems to me that the 
> > CHECK-MESSAGES aren't actually being verified by this test?
> > 
> > unless I'm missing something.
> > 
> > TIA
> `check_clang_tidy` invokes FileCheck. Does something else make you think 
> these labels are being tested?? 
whilst investigating an unrelated issue on our internal branch, I tried 
editting the check lines in this test and wasn't able to create a failure. but 
if I add

'| FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-MESSAGES' to the run line and then edit the 
checks, I can induce an error.

This could be an issue on our internal branch though... :shrug: thanks for the 
speedy reply.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D101259/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D101259

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to