NoQ added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp:836-837 + NewState, NewNode, + C.getNoteTag([Msg](PathSensitiveBugReport &BR, + llvm::raw_ostream &OS) { OS << Msg; })); } ---------------- martong wrote: > steakhal wrote: > > This way each and every applied constraint will be displayed even if the > > given argument does not constitute to the bug condition. > > I recommend you branching within the lambda, on the interestingness of the > > given argument constraint. > Okay, good point, thanks for the feedback! I am planning to change to this > direction. Excellent catch @steakhal! I think you can always emit the note but only mark it as //unprunable// when the argument is interesting. This way it'd work identically to our normal "Assuming..." notes. ================ Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/std-c-library-functions-arg-constraints-note-tags.cpp:16 +int test_note(int x, int y) { + __single_val_1(x); // expected-note{{Applied constraint: The 1st arg should be within the range [1, 1]}} + return y / (1 - x); // expected-warning{{Division by zero}} \ ---------------- martong wrote: > NoQ wrote: > > This has to be a user-friendly message. > > * "Constraints" is compiler jargon. > > * We cannot afford shortening "argument" to "arg". > > * Generally, the less machine-generated it looks the better (":" is > > definitely robotic). > Okay, thanks for your comment. I can make it to be more similar to the other > notes we already have. What about this? > ``` > Assuming the 1st argument is within the range [1, 1] > ``` > > > We cannot afford shortening "argument" to "arg". > I'd like to address this in another following patch if you don't mind. This sounds good for a generic message. I still think that most of the time these messages should be part of the summary. Eg., ``` Assuming the 1st argument is within range [33, 47] U [58, 64] U [91, 96] U [123, 125] ``` ideally should be rephrased as ``` Assuming the argument is a punctuation character ``` in the summary of `ispunct()`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D101526/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D101526 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits