lebedev.ri added a comment. In D100581#2723621 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100581#2723621>, @Abpostelnicu wrote:
> In D100581#2723611 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100581#2723611>, @lebedev.ri > wrote: > >> In D100581#2723505 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100581#2723505>, @Abpostelnicu >> wrote: >> >>> Also I don’t remember seeing this proposed on cfe dev mailing list. >> >> There is no such requirement. I don't recall that happening basically ever, >> actually. > > Of course, but I would have wanted to see this discussed on the mailing list > since the pool of the affected actors by this is very big. If we subtract the false-positives, i'm not really sure what should be discussed. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D100581/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D100581 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
