cor3ntin added a comment. In D93031#2706988 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93031#2706988>, @joerg wrote:
> "Keeping the original spelling around" would assume that the input is not > using a stateful encoding. That seems worse as assumption than giving the > canonical output in UTF-8 and shifting the problem to the user's editor? Right, terrible choice of words s/original spelling/the concatenated, non-encoded string literal, in UTF-8 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D93031/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D93031 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits