aaron.ballman added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19876#423582, @etienneb wrote:
> Aaron? minus re-generation of the doc. > Is that what you want to see? Yes, this is the direction I was hoping for, thank you! > note: returned types for both getLength are not the same (APInt vs unsigned > int). > I took the 'hasSize'-Matcher approach to let overloaded operators do the job > for dispatching types. Perfect! > note: there is a unittest for top-level node that is no longer valid because > stringLiteral can be a top-level node now. Thank you for that explanation, I was curious about that. :-) http://reviews.llvm.org/D19876 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
