asavonic added a comment. In D100591#2692599 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100591#2692599>, @rjmccall wrote:
> I think the right thing to do here is to recognize generally that we're > emitting a mandatory tail call, and so suppress *all* the normal > transformations on the return value. I assume it can be tricky to detect such call. The final decision (tail call vs normal call) is made before instruction selection, after all LLVM IR optimization passes. So we can miss tail calls that are not obvious on non-optimized code, or get false-positive results for calls that a backend decides to emit as normal calls. In any case, this patch can be useful not only for tail calls: `trunc + zext` sequence generated to round a return value can be problematic for other cases as well. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D100591/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D100591 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
