djasper accepted this revision.
djasper added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

Looks good.


================
Comment at: clang-tidy/misc/UnusedUsingDeclsCheck.cpp:39
@@ +38,3 @@
+    // Ignores using-declarations defined in class definition.
+    if (isa<CXXRecordDecl>(TargetDecl->getDeclContext()))
+      return;
----------------
Ack. I think this is actually ok for now. 

================
Comment at: clang-tidy/misc/UnusedUsingDeclsCheck.cpp:66
@@ -59,4 +65,3 @@
       Used = Specialization->getSpecializedTemplate();
-    auto I = FoundDecls.find(Used->getCanonicalDecl());
-    if (I != FoundDecls.end())
-      I->second = nullptr;
+    removeFromFoundDecls(Used->getCanonicalDecl());
+    return;
----------------
Maybe the ->getCanonicalDecl() should be moved into removeFromFoundDecls?


http://reviews.llvm.org/D20018



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to