Qix- marked an inline comment as not done.
Qix- added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp:4100-4102
+  // directly. The recording happens here because this is the only place
+  // where user-defined (via plugins) attributes are parsed, and thus
+  // they care about the token stream directly.
----------------
Qix- wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > I think plugins will expect these tokens to be available regardless of 
> > which attribute syntax is used, so you may need to look into also doing 
> > work for GNU and declspec attribute argument lists.
> As far as I understand (and perhaps poorly communicated in the comment) is 
> that plugin-defined attributes will always hit this codepath as opposed to 
> the built-in attribute parsers.
> 
> I could be wrong here, though. Are arbitrary tokens even allowed in 
> GNU/Declspec attributes? I thought it was just the C2x/C++ attributes syntax 
> that allowed non-identifier tokens in the first place.
> 
> Either way, from what I could tell (trying a few different implementations of 
> this change), this is the only place where user-defined attributes are 
> parsed. I certainly could be missing something though.
See my latest top-level comment.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D99861/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D99861

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to