balazske added a subscriber: Eugene.Zelenko. balazske added a comment. In D97960#2611531 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97960#2611531>, @Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> I think call stack may be useful for other checks too. May be code should be > moved to utilities? Yes it is useful for other checks, but the code here is specialized for this problem only. It is possible to make a call graph that stores the "parents" of the calls, probably root items that are of a special kind, and can add notes for call chain. But there is already a `clang::CallGraph` that can compute call graph, if I remember correctly it was not usable here because the parent node (caller) is not available. That `CallGraph` could be extended too. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D97960/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D97960 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
