HsiangKai added a comment. In D97264#2663082 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97264#2663082>, @rogfer01 wrote:
> I was under the impression we didn't want to use class-member access syntax > for vector tuples (see > https://github.com/riscv/rvv-intrinsic-doc/issues/17#issuecomment-628998077 ) > so we don't need a record type, do we? > > Perhaps it is possible to model them like opaque entities similar to what we > do with RVV vectors where they are expanded in `CodegenTypes.cpp`? > > Access to fields would have to be through intrinsics, though I think this > didn't scale very well, did it? Do you mean treat the Zvlsseg types as kind of builtin types? I want to avoid to add too much builtin types in Clang. That is why I use implicit defined RecordType for Zvlsseg types. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D97264/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D97264 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
