frasercrmck accepted this revision.
frasercrmck added inline comments.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp:259
       .Case("riscv64", Is64Bit)
+      .Case("64bit", Is64Bit)
       .Case("m", HasM)
----------------
craig.topper wrote:
> frasercrmck wrote:
> > What's the difference between this new feature and `riscv64` above?
> The name I added to initFeatureMap has to match the feature name in RISCV.td 
> because it will end up in the target-features attribute in IR.
> 
> SemaChecking just calls hasFeature, but CodeGenFunction also checks builtin 
> features using the feature map. We check features in SemaChecking because the 
> CodeGenFunction diagnostic isn’t phrased well for RISCV.
Ah I see, so since it has to match our `"64bit"` `SubtargetFeature` we can't 
reuse `"riscv64"`? Thanks.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D99984/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D99984

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to