steakhal abandoned this revision.
steakhal added a comment.

In D99658#2671747 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99658#2671747>, @NoQ wrote:

> I mean, the extent of an `ElementRegion` //is// the size of a single element. 
> The reason why our intrinsic isn't doing what you expect is because we 
> represent the pointer with offset as `ElementRegion` regardless of whether 
> operator `[]` was used. On the other hand, an `SVal` doesn't ever represent a 
> region at all, it only points to its first byte, regardless of the structure 
> of `MemRegion` inside it; for that reason `clang_analyzer_getExtent()` is 
> impossible to implement correctly in our current model.
>
> So i think both behaviors are incorrect but if you think it makes it easier 
> to write tests then absolutely go for it!

Oh, I got it. Hm, yes, both are wrong xD

TBH since the new dumpExtent debug functions 
89d210fe1a7a1c6cbf926df0595b6f107bc491d5 
<https://reviews.llvm.org/rG89d210fe1a7a1c6cbf926df0595b6f107bc491d5> landed, I 
no longer need this, thus I'm abandoning this change.
Thank you all for the review though.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D99658/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D99658

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to