davidstone added a comment. It looks like this change was originally added 9 years ago with a commit message of
"Lambda closure types are always considered to be like "local" classes, even if they are not within a function scope. Teach template instantiation to treat them as such, and make sure that we have a local instantiation scope when instantiating default arguments and static data members." but unfortunately, it does not include the context to explain *why* this is the case. There do not appear to be any tests that capture this, and I haven't found code that fails to compile / causes the compiled code's unit tests to fail. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D99134/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D99134 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
