mizvekov added a comment.

In D99005#2639501 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99005#2639501>, @aaronpuchert 
wrote:

> For coroutines I have D68845 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68845>. The current 
> code is wrong, and not trivial to fix. We have never properly implemented 
> P1825 <https://reviews.llvm.org/P1825> and will probably just go with P2266 
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/P2266> unconditionally, because that two-phase 
> lookup is very cumbersome to imlement.

Okay, once this is properly tested, we can spin a separate patch from this, 
just taking the coroutine bits unconditionally, and propose a new DR.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D99005/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D99005

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to