NoQ added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp:343
+ if (!DRV.isEmpty()) {
+ Out << Sep << "Mutex destroys with unknown result:" << NL;
+ for (auto I : DRV) {
----------------
balazske wrote:
> NoQ wrote:
> > I think this should be passive. The mutex doesn't actively destroy anybody.
> Maybe "Mutex destroy calls with unknown result:"? This is a title of a list,
> not about a single mutex.
Oh that's what you meant, I see.
"[[
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/866837/plural-form-of-word-mutex#comment674585_866837
| Mutexes ]] in unresolved possibly destroyed state:"?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D98502/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D98502
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
