yubing added a comment. In D93594#2628497 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93594#2628497>, @nikic wrote:
> It looks like this has caused a compile-time regression at `O0`: > https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=9341bcbdc93a251b632ffaa51a84452a7a4a5e4e&to=4f198b0c27b04e830a3069aaf4b39cf203eaae4a&stat=instructions > > The cause is probably the computation of DomTree and LoopInfo, even if no AMX > intrinsics are present. I think you should be able to easily fix this by not > fetching DT/LI from the pass manager, and computing them in the pass instead > (only if intrinsics are present). Thanks, @nikic, I will fix it ASAP. Besides, How could I reproduce the regression? Eh, I am asking these question because I think I should see if the repression can't be reproduced with my future bugfix. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D93594/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D93594 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
