aaron.ballman added a comment.

As far as the changes go, these seem reasonable to me, though I find it a bit 
odd that these are expressions without a type whereas a `ParenExpr` has a type 
of the underlying parenthesized expression. e.g.,

  int x(0); // (0) has void type
  int y = (0); // (0) has int type

I think my natural assumption is that the init expression would have the type 
of the thing that's being initialized.

Despite that, I think the changes LG, but I'd like to hear from @rsmith.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D98664/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D98664

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to