aaron.ballman added a comment. As far as the changes go, these seem reasonable to me, though I find it a bit odd that these are expressions without a type whereas a `ParenExpr` has a type of the underlying parenthesized expression. e.g.,
int x(0); // (0) has void type int y = (0); // (0) has int type I think my natural assumption is that the init expression would have the type of the thing that's being initialized. Despite that, I think the changes LG, but I'd like to hear from @rsmith. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D98664/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D98664 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits