EricWF added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19412#417729, @rmaprath wrote:
> So, perhaps it is best to leave these pthread mutexes alone, purely for > performance reasons. We'll have to excuse a couple of `#ifdef > _LIBCPP_THREAD_API_XXXX` conditionals in the library sources to allow the > external threading API to function. > > Does that sound like an OK compromise? @EricWF, @mclow.lists? Sounds good to me. Although we should probably change these from `pthread_mutex_t` to `__libcpp_mutex_t`. http://reviews.llvm.org/D19412 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
