Eugene.Zelenko added a comment. In D97361#2589673 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97361#2589673>, @balazske wrote:
> You can look into **misc/UnusedUsingDeclsCheck.cpp** (if not done yet), that > check handles `using` too. And that check is related to this check, the > module should be the same too (`misc`)? Majority of `redundant` checks are in `readability`. Awhile ago I suggested separate group for `unused` checks or move them to Clang. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D97361/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D97361 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
