HsiangKai added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/ASTContext.h:1024 +#define RVV_TUPLE(Name, ElemId, Id, SingletonId, NE, EB, NF, IsSigned, IsFP) \ + QualType SingletonId; #include "clang/Basic/RISCVVTypes.def" ---------------- craig.topper wrote: > craig.topper wrote: > > Why is this QualType and not CanQualType? I don't know what the difference > > is myself. > Is there any downside to adding all these members to the ASTContext? I > suspect the builtin types have grown quite a bit since this was initially set > up. @rjmccall or @rsmith is this something we need to be concerned about? CanQualType could not be used for typedef types. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D97264/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D97264 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
