njames93 added inline comments.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/misc-static-assert.cpp:40-41
assert(myfunc(1, 2));
- // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: found assert() that could be
replaced by static_assert() [misc-static-assert]
- // CHECK-FIXES: {{^ }}static_assert(myfunc(1, 2), "");
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES-CXX11: :[[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: found assert() that could
be replaced by static_assert() [misc-static-assert]
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES-CXX17: :[[@LINE-2]]:3: warning: found assert() that could
be replaced by static_assert() [misc-static-assert]
+ // CHECK-FIXES-CXX11: {{^ }}static_assert(myfunc(1, 2), "");
----------------
This seems to be a shortfall in check_clang_tidy.py. It will pass
CHECK-MESSAGES-CXX(11|17) as a prefix to file check even though it knows it
wasn't in the source file. This causes filecheck to fail.
Duplicating the CHECK-MESSAGE for each is just a work around.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97313/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97313
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
